What was a significant contrast between Wilson and Clemenceau's views on Germany?

Bert Clemenceau, the French Prime Minister, and Woodrow Wilson, the U.S. President, had significantly different perspectives on how to deal with Germany after World War I. Clemenceau believed that Germany should face severe penalties and reparations for its role in the war, driven by the desire to weaken Germany to prevent future aggression and safeguard France. He felt that Wilson's approach was overly lenient and did not adequately address the threat that a potentially resurgent Germany posed to France and Europe.

In contrast, Wilson aimed for a peace that would promote stability and prevent future conflicts, emphasizing self-determination and the need for countries to resolve their disputes without excessive punishment. His Fourteen Points called for a more diplomatic and less punitive framework, which was at odds with Clemenceau's desire for strict consequences.

This marked a significant contrast between the two leaders’ views: while Clemenceau sought to impose strict reparations and punitive measures on Germany, Wilson advocated for a more lenient treatment that would encourage cooperation and lasting peace.